The Brompton: engineering for change – for life

City cycling by Brompton: Holborn viaduct, London. October 2022

I love my Brompton Electric bike, as I explained in this blogpost in 2019. So I was delighted to receive as a birthday present The Brompton, a book by Brompton Bicycle chief executive Will Butler-Adams and journalist Dan Davies.

It’s not a typical book about bikes. It’s part history of Britain’s best-loved folding bike, part business biography and part call to arms in the battle for the future of our cities. Butler-Adams is an eloquent advocate for the role of the bike in transforming lives – but more of that later.

Brompton’s progress

Butler-Adams is brutally open about the challenges of growing the Brompton business, and his relationship with the brilliant designer of the iconic bike, Andrew Ritchie. Will joined the company as a ‘young designer and dogsbody’, but after becoming CEO insisted that the founder stepped back from operational control. Ritchie found this painful – sometimes he’d only find out about his successor’s plans during a board meeting. Butler-Adams also felt the pressure, comparing it with the ordeal of an embattled leader facing prime minister’s questions.

I was intrigued to read about Brompton’s move to take its distribution network in-house, after years of working with distributors. Will poignantly describes the warm relationship the bike brand had with many of its former distributors, especially Simon Koorn of Fiets a Parts in the Netherlands. At one time Bromptons were sold with completely different names in the Benelux countries, such as Brompton-Ralph and Potter-Brompton. But as the world went online, people compared prices and specs between countries, and Adams-Butler concluded that the old ways would have to change. So Brompton bought out its distribution partners, a process he says was neither easy nor pleasant. He describes breaking the news to Simon Koom as one of the most agonising and emotional meetings he’s ever held.

This is just one example of the way that Adams-Butler took a far sighted, strategic approach to growing Brompton from a small scale manufacturer of a fairly niche bike to a business that can genuinely have an impact on how people move around our cities (and beyond). Leadership isn’t easy, and few companies thrive if leaders put off difficult decisions. Will recognised that Brompton had to increase dramatically the number of bikes Brompton can produce to meet actual and future demand.

Brompton’s old factory, Brentford, London

This is Brompton’s old factory at Brentford, just off the A4. I drove past it every day on my way home from work. I always smiled when I saw Brompton employees cycling their Brommies along Lionel Road South as they left work for the day. I first saw the company’s clever new logo image of a Brompton in the three stages of folding on the factory wall. I felt sad when they moved, but I was thrilled that the best folding bike was still being made in London, a city that has largely abandoned its manufacturing tradition.

Will vividly describes the reasons for the move: ‘In Brentford, the space was gradually strangling us… We had enough demand to run two production lines but there was only room for one…’ But he added that moving was a huge gamble. Moving only made sense if the new factory had space for future expansion, but that extra space for the future came with a price tag. Many companies don’t survive expansion. Happily, Brompton flourished after moving to Greenford in 2016 and is now planning a bigger factory in Kent.

My Brompton journey

I bought my first Brompton 20 years ago. It was prompted by desperation: how to get to work in the City of London during a tube strike. I made an impulse purchase in Evans Cycles in Waterloo the night before the strike, and took my new bike on the Bakerloo line, trying to convince myself that it didn’t weigh a tonne. I was one of the few people at HSBC’s old HQ in the City on strike day – a testimony to the independence the Brompton gave me.

I didn’t use that first Brompton very often – but it was my magic carpet for car services and, in the photos above, rugby international day in Cardiff. My Dad dropped me on the outskirts of Cardiff city centre ahead of Wales’s Rugby World Cup 2015 game against Fuji, and I cycled back to Penarth after the game.

My Brompton Electric at Marylebone station, 2019

Will Butler-Adams says that ‘hardly any Brompton owner I’ve met has said anything other than the bike has changed their lives’. My second Brommie has certainly done that.

It was also an impulse purchase, but in this case the impulse changed my travel habits. That’s certainly because it was an electric folder. Forget the idea that using an electric bike is cheating – as Will says, that’s confusing sport with transport. (More on that later.)

I found joy in the fun and freedom that the new bike gave me. I could fly to my local station without breaking into a sweat, before folding the Brompton for the quick journey to London. At the other end, rather than descending with the masses to the Underground, I’d unfold the bike and weave my way through London traffic to my meetings.

I relished those crisp winter commutes, and took pride in cycling through the inevitable showers. But then 2020’s lockdown made my loft my office, exiling my pride and joy to the garage as I used my sportier bikes on those precious dally exercise outings.

Happily, the Covid cloud finally lifted this year, and I started going back to the office. I now had two options: drive to my old office in Richmond, or get the train to our new office in Fleet Place near St Paul’s Cathedral in London. The Brompton made the decision for me. On the very first post-Covid cycle-train commute to the City I was hooked: my old electric dream was as powerful as ever. I now opt for the City commute, saving £15 a time on the station car park and extra fare for taking the Tube. That’s the Brompton dividend without even considering the health benefit and intoxicating buzz you get from beating a Porsche away from the lights…

Saving the city

This is the view ahead of my Brompton as I head home from the City under Holborn Viaduct. London is a far more cycle-friendly city than in my early cycling commuting days in 1989: spot the segregated cycle path. The traffic lights in the distance give cyclists a head start, going green a few seconds before letting other vehicles through. It’s not like this throughout my ride to Marylebone, but the traffic is generally far lighter than in 1989. In short, it’s a pleasure.

Solving the manure problem

When my grandparents were born in the 1890s. the huge problem cities faced was manure. There were some 75,000 working horses on the streets of London alone, pulling carts and cabs. The Times predicted that by the middle of the 20th century the streets would be buried under nine feet of manure. The problem was solved with the rise of the internal combustion engine. But that solution is now causing a crisis of its own, contributing to climate change and threatening our health through air pollution. And, as Butler-Adams and Davies points out, every car owner in London is given an asset (car parking) worth at least £10,000 for a charge of under 2 per cent a year, based on the average land values in London. Yet barely half of London’s households own a car. 

There’s a huge debate about the future of our cities and how we move beyond the kingdom of the car. Many people assume that the electric car is a panacea,, but it isn’t. Two striking facts from The Brompton book: a single car parking space could accommodate 42 folded Bromptons. And the battery in an Audi Q4 car could power 150 electric bikes, which would not need new charging infrastructure. When the average car journey is just eight miles, there’s a huge opportunity to get people out of their metal boxes and onto bikes. 

Amsterdam shows the way

Above: Amsterdam in the 1970s: gridlock and protests against the toll that car culture was inflicting. Photo L: @BrentToderian: R: Environmental Justice Atlas

Walking along Amsterdam’s peaceful canal-side streets today, it’s hard to believe the city authorities once thought cars were more important than children’s lives. Like many historic European cities, it was not designed for the car. As a result, cyclists and pedestrians lost out, and tragically over 400 children were killed in Amsterdam traffic accidents in 1971. The city even filled in canals to make more room for roads in the 1960s. (As if the world needed another Chicago more than it needed historic Amsterdam.) A women’s protest movement called Stop de Kindermoor (stop the child murder) helped secure a transformation, and today more than 38 per cent of trips in Amsterdam are by bike, compared with 2 per cent in Britain. 

Transport, not sport

The bike is an incredible invention: a brilliant means of transport as well as a British sporting success story. But the bike’s sports role can be a distraction, creating an assumption you need to wear Lycra and a helmet to cycle from A to B. When I cycled around Cardiff as a child in the Seventies I wore normal clothes, while cycle helmets were unknown. That’s still true in the Netherlands. There is no need for either in a country that takes cycling seriously and provides proper cycle routes. As a cyclist who relishes breaking a personal best on Strava, I’ve had to adapt to city cycling, taking pleasure in navigating the city rather than racing to beat the lights. It’s so rewarding.

I can’t wait to see where Britain’s cycle transport revolution takes us in the next 10 years.

Responses

  1. […] a new City of London office at Fleet Place in September and I rediscovered the pleasure of using my Brompton Electric in combination with the train to commute there from Buckinghamshire. It saves me around £13 a time […]

  2. S. Koorn Avatar

    “At one time Bromptons were sold with completely different names in the Benelux countries, such as Brompton-Ralph and Potter-Brompton. But as the world went online, people compared prices and specs between countries”

    Looked at from a BeNeLux perspective many prospect Brompton-buyers were allway well aware of possible differences in price between Bromptons sold in the Uk and in The Netherlands an Belgium (Luxemburg is a complete different story).

    Ever since 1986-1989 when Fiets à parts started distributing Bromptons, the bikes were in very short supply.
    From the real start in 1989 the orderbook was filled with demands that could not be met by production in over 3 years.
    That meant that Dutch and Flemish dealers were (for yeras until 2008) haevily rationed in their shopsupply and customers had to cue in line for often over 6-9 months to get their bike.

    No wonder that many customers thought it to be clever to hop over on the ferry (or Chunnel-Train) and later when planetickets dropped, and buy the damned bike in London where bikes were not that scarse and and believed to be cheaper. The latter often being true because of the very volatile exchangerates between the (generally falling) British-Pound and the Dutch Guilder.
    Even though the bikes were meant to have the almost exact same price in both markets the fluctuations in exchangerate migth easily cause price difference from 5% up to 20%; In theory the cost of a daytrip to London to fetch the bike was often paid by de this difference.
    This problem was partly solved by Fàp by active exchange-monitoring which often meant to drop prices in midseason and sometimes even compensate dealers. When after the productionvolumes increased this did however not end the shortage but it meant that Fàp was much more able to ammend pricedifference by digging in to its own margins in favour of the dealermargins.

    But as said the pricing between UK and BeNeLux markets was meant to be equal, still Dutch (and Germany) specced bikes were generally somewhat mor exspencie due to different regulations, especially wher lights an reflection were concerned. In principle all roadbike (with a tyre with ≥25mm) had to have mandatory dynamo-lights, an aproved rearreflector (much wider than used in the UK), and tyres or rims with full-circle aproved white (non yellow) sidewall-reflection. Since the latter wasn’t possiblle on small wheels ≤18″ an exception was made for childsbikes (that were expected not to be used on public roads).
    These regulations meant that in principle the L-type was not allowed on Dutch roads (because there was no provision for approved/dynamo lights), it made the T-type (with mandatory light and all) counted for ≥95% of sales in the Netherlands and ≥85% in Belgium.

    Halfway the 90’s there was another factor which made bikesales of L-types difficult.
    To encourage bike-to-work use a taxinsentive was introduced that allowed
    employee to get a free (mandatory equiped) bike from their employer given that had a catalogue price of no more than ƒ1499,99. At introduction that meat even the standard Dutch T5 was just in that range, but when Brompton had to raise its productionprices (again), only the L3 fell into that price, but it lacked the madatory standards.

    This taxscheme might easily have meant the end to Brompton as a factary, since the Netherlands/BeNeLux accounted already for ≥30% of sales.
    After lots of thought Simon Koorn and Andrew Ritchie came up with a solution.
    Since the taxrules allowed the user to get an accessorie-package upto ≥ƒ30o/bike with the same taxinsentive it was possible put in the T-package into an accessoiries-deal with the bike make botyh the bike legal again as well as falling again within the allowed pricerange.

    With this in mind a new very basic Brompton was created aspecially for the Dutch (and BeNeLux) market: The Lx (intentionally with no/1 gear(s) but for since teh 1-speed Brompton was notv ready yet it had 3 gears) and that could be ammended with 4 accessoriepackages: L3, L5, T3, T5 (after the demise of Sturmey-Archer: L3, L6, T3, T6).
    This created the the Lx-T3 and Lx-T5 as a modular bikeconcept to m,eet the Dutch Taxrules, and it served it cause, Brompton could be sold again even when it meant that we had to explain many Taxinspectors, accountants ant admistrators of hospitals, univirsities how to stick apply the taxerules so that the insentive was met.

    It was a dirty trick, but it worked.
    Still No-one was really happy with it, especially since it meant that modelnames were not the same anymore across EU-markets.
    We lobbied intensevely with the tpoliticians and the taxeoffice to change the wording of the taxeinsentive to make it possible to allow teh sales of somewhat more expensive bikes (even if it meant that the price over the €1499-limit was to be excluded from it).
    After several years and the introduction of a total new Income-tyax scheme our problem was solved.
    And since Brompton at the time (2004) was at the brink of a complete changeover with a newe frame , beter specced component and all, it was time to bring in the naming in line again. Brompton-model were to be named after several towns within England named Brompton. After carefull selection the to Brompton towns in Sommerset were selected for the aal steel Bromptons and to Brompton-town in Yorkshitre were put in reserve foor the superlight Bromptons (with partly titanium frames) that were planned for the near future.
    We/everyone were happy to say goodbay to the complexty of selling modular Bromptons and the newe names were first introduced in the BeNeLaux with the UK soon to follow at the introduction of the new superlightbikes and some new handelbar-options.
    But than annother unnexpected change took place at Brompton, after Julian Verreker the share of Brompton had to be redistributed amangst old and newe shareholders; these shareholders now thought it was time that Brompton becam a serious firm with a real marketing department which lead to one key-person In fact teh key-manager besides Andrew-Ritchie at Brompton to leave. In came two new figures one of them Will Buttler Adams the other the first of a few short lived marketingmanagers. And this first marketing-manager somehowe fell in love with the modular-bike concept we just wanted to part with. It was his grand-stand and it allso meant the first cracks between London and the BeNeLux markets where the new town-based names were allready greatly appreciated for well over a year. When we submitted the renewed modular scheme based on the letter-names (where the meaning of these letters in several cases conflicted with the previous letter-names) most (Key)dealers were furiousy opposed and demanded that we kept te town-based naming which was easy to explain to customers an dealer alike. So we kept teh names (but allso introduced supplied translationschemes to easily compare UK-names with BNL-names). Andrew Ritchy understood things went allong with this situation, but the two new guys did hardly understand the/our problems with their new marketing-baby.

    This was the reason why the naming of the bikes were different over a period of several years. Had Brompton (as intended) adopted the Brompton-townnames it would have made lot of difference to dealers all over the world; dealers now still are struggling with meaningless often changing letter-names that in severeal cases are very confusing since every new change in the lettering-system results in more conflicts with the the previous lettering-systems or lettering-systems that are market-specific;
    For example: traditionally fot the Dutch biketrade a >T< stands for Drumbrakes (trommelremmen), >K< for calliperbrakes (knijpremmen) and in Dutch and German the >R< stands for Coasterbrake (Ruckwärtsbremse) >L< often stands for lights >S< for Sachs, >SA< for Sturmey-Archer and >Sh< for Shimano, the >X< stands for option(al) (often a coulour or number of gears to be specifiedd later) and so on.

  3. […] My first e-bike was a Brompton Electric. I found it brilliant for commuting to London: I’d cycle to the local railway station, pop the folded bike on the train, and spin across town from Marylebone to various places in the West End and City. I saved over £16 a day in car parking and the cost of the onward London tube journey from Marylebone. And it meant one fewer car on my local roads. I wrote more about my Brompton Electric experience here. […]

Leave a Reply to Cycling into 2023 | ErtblogCancel reply

Discover more from Ertblog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading