This post comprises a pedant and me

Bryan Henderson is famous – as a pedant. The world’s media put him under the spotlight last week for correcting the same error 47,000 times in Wikipedia. He hates the phrase ‘comprised of’ – arguing the ‘of’ is unnecessary. The story took me back to my days reading Ernest Gowers’ The Complete Plain Words in university in 1984: it was one of the phrases Gowers singled out as a howler.

I’ve never edited a single Wikipedia entry. But I felt a tremble of recognition when I read of Henderson’s obsession. As I get older, I get more irritated by language (and number) howlers. Here are some of my pet hates.

Language inflation. Build out; test out; off of. Just a few phrases that have suffered parasitic appendages.

Doppelgängers: words that have been replaced by identical sounding cousins: it’s/its; your/you’re; there/their/they’re. Years ago, it’s/its was the most common error, but your/you’re seems just as common now:  ‘Your welcome’…

Talking telephone numbers: companies that spend money on beautiful shop fronts and signs, but don’t know that the area phone code for London is 020 and Cardiff is 029. I’ve lost count of signs giving numbers starting 0207, 0208 and 02920.

No such code as 0207

Don’t try dialling 724 0055 

This Marylebone shop can’t get its own number right. Anyone dialling 724 0055 will get an unobtainable tone. The 7 in 0207 is actually part of the number, not the area code.

Does it matter? No, not compared with life’s real horrors. But accuracy does matter. Hats off to Bryan Henderson. Or hat’s off as some would say….

3 thoughts on “This post comprises a pedant and me

  1. One of my pet hates is “would/should of” instead of “would/should have”. I blame poor teaching. Give the explanation – would you I say “I of done it”? no – you would say “I have done it”. It’s simple.

  2. Oh – and speaking of numbers, I slightly disagree with you regarding telephone numbers. The majority of numbers consist of a 5 digit area code, followed by a 6 digit code (actually the next three are also area codes, but smaller areas). So our home number is 01666 860 *** – 01666 being the Malmesbury exchange, the 860 being the Minety exchange and the last 3 digits OUR number. So I think that to refer to Cardiff as 02920 is reasonable (that’s how I remember it). Yes, London is different (as are some other large cities. However, VoiP means that this convention doesn’t always apply – and you’ve always been able to get an out-of-area number (for an extra charge). Pedants need absolute rules!

    • Completely agree with the have/of howler. I corrected Owen several times this weekend for this. (But then he is 6…)

      On the Cardiff telephone numbers: when the Cardiff code changed in 2000, 01222 became 029 and an extra 20 was added to the actual number…. It’s not part of the code. Cardiff, London and several other cities have two digit codes.

What do you think? Please leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s